Ugnay sa amin

Ukraina

Paggawa ng Negosyo sa Ukraine: Pag-aaral ng Kaso ng Excalibur 

IBAHAGI:

Nai-publish

on

Sa gitna ng geopolitical turbulence na humahawak sa Ukraine, isang tahimik na pakikibaka ang nagbubukas-isang kuwento ng katiwalian, impluwensya, at labanan para sa hustisya.

Since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the European Union and its member states ay nagbigay ng $47 bilyon sa suportang pinansyal at badyet, gayundin sa tulong na makatao at emergency. Ang United Kingdom, bilang isa sa mga nangungunang donor sa Ukraine, ay naglaan ng halos £12 bilyon. Sa pambihirang suportang ito, kailangang magpatuloy ang Ukraine sa pagpapatibay ng mga pagbabago sa mga sektor ng hudikatura at anti-korapsyon.

The initiated reforms on the path to European integration have already affected Ukraine’s position in key global indices. In 2023, Ukraine made significant strides in enhancing its anti-corruption efforts, obtaining the 104th position out of 180 nations in the global index. Among the candidate countries of the European Union, Ukraine has exhibited the most noteworthy advancement in this index over the previous decade.

Naapektuhan din ng mga reporma ang estado ng sektor ng negosyo ng Ukrainian, bilang ebidensya ng pinakabagong survey ng UBI (Ukrainian Business Index), na noong Agosto 2023 nakatayo sa 38.23 sa 100. Bahagyang tumaas ang figure na ito kumpara noong Hunyo 2023 (35.34) at ang lokal na mababang noong Setyembre 2022 (33.9). Eksperto ng mula sa Center for Innovative Development ay nagmumungkahi na ang pagtaas sa index ay nagpapakita ng pagnanais ng mga negosyo na palakasin ang kanilang mga aktibidad dahil sa pagod sa kawalan ng katiyakan, sa halip na bilang resulta ng mga pagpapabuti ng ekonomiya.

In order to sustain the current favorable trajectory of combatting corruption and facilitating a robust economic revival, it is essential to analyze and prioritize challenges that could impede the objectives of European integration. Therefore, we have examined the Excalibur vessel ownership case in Ukraine’s Odesa region, which we deem crucial within this framework.

Ang mga kaso ng ang sisidlan ng Excalibur.

Mula noong 2015, ang Excalibur ay nabubulok sa Ilyichevsk Shipyard. Noong Marso 2015, nang walang pahintulot ng may-ari nito, isang indibidwal na Israeli, ang barko ay dinala sa mga pantalan ng Ilyichevsk Shipyard para sa pagpapanatili. Ang kumpanyang CC Nordic Group K/S, na sumang-ayon na ayusin ang sasakyang-dagat sa ilalim ng isang kontrata, ay hindi kasali at tumigil sa operasyon noong 2015.

Gamit ang mga pekeng dokumento, ang pagmamay-ari ng Excalibur ay inilipat mula sa Conwealth Development SA (Panama) patungo sa isa pang kumpanyang Panamanian, Gellar Equities Corp. Gayunpaman, ang Conwealth Development SA ay walang koneksyon sa pagmamay-ari ng Excalibur kahit ano pa man. Ang tunay na benepisyaryo ng parehong kumpanya ay isang mamamayang Ruso sa pangalan ni Maxim Moskalev.

anunsyo

Simula noon, ang may-ari ng sasakyang-dagat ay nagpapatuloy sa mga legal at kriminal na paglilitis sa iba't ibang hurisdiksyon kabilang ang Cyprus at Ukraine.

It has been observed that Maxim Moskalev had established relationships with high-ranking officials from Russia, who held significant influence over the Ukrainian justice system through their supporters of the “Russian world” (transliteration from the original Russkiy mir — ed.) — the socio-political, geopolitical, and ideological doctrine of Putinism. On account of this, combined with the issue of corruption among Ukrainian officials, Mr. Moskalev was able to evade accountability and escape punishment.

The Excalibur, having been subject to a prolonged period of technical deterioration, was assessed to be a safety risk, rendering it unsuitable for its intended purpose. Consequently, the vessel has been reduced to scrap metal and continues to remain at the shipyard’s berths.

However, Mr. Maxim Moskalev’s actions extended beyond the mere acquisition of the Excalibur. Although his home country, Russia, is engaged in a territorial war with Ukraine, Moskalev has directed his associates to exert corrupt influence on Ukrainian judges. The ultimate goal of this influence was to secure $3.5 million in compensation from an Israeli citizen. The compensation was sought by Gellar Equities Corp., a company controlled by Maxim Moskalev, and was purportedly for lost profits resulting from the operation of an aging barge.

There are other cases of Mr. Moskalev’s involvement in corrupt practices besides the Excalibur case. One such case is Moskalev v. Yanishevsky, where Dmitry Yanishevsky filed a statutory request to Maxim Moskalev in England regarding a default judgment obtained in Hong Kong for USD 6.4 million. Moskalev, a Russian citizen residing in Cyprus, refused the request, claiming that his center of main interests (COMI) was not located in England and Wales. He was also appealing the judgment in Hong Kong on suspicion of forgery.

Even though Moskalev objected to the Conflict of Interest (COI) in England and Wales, he was personally served with the request at his wife’s apartment in London. Moskalev rejected the request, citing his foreign citizenship, lack of residence in the London apartment, and his intention to contest the validity of the sentence. He requested Yanishevsky to withdraw the request.

Yanishevsky disagreed with Moskalev’s arguments about the COI, stating that they lacked credibility. Yanishevsky presented evidence linking Moskalev to the London apartment and refuted his claims of forgery. Although Moskalev suggested extending the time limit to appeal the request and the Hong Kong verdict, Yanishevsky refused any reimbursement of costs.

Moskalev argued that Yanishevskyi’s refusal to withdraw his request must have consequences since the court found that Moskalev had refuted the request in a timely manner and Yanishevskyi’s refusal was unreasonable.

Ang hukuman pinasiyahan that Moskalev had sufficient grounds for reimbursement of the debt, recognizing him as the prevailing party in the case – he was eventually reimbursed £47,400 by Yanishevsky. Ang law firm na kumakatawan sa Moskalev sinabi na ang dahilan para sa desisyon na ito ay na si Yanishevsky ay kumilos nang labag sa batas sa pamamagitan ng paghahain ng mga hindi wastong paghahabol (o bangkarota o mga petisyon sa pagpuksa). 

Mga konklusyon. 

It is essential to recognize that Ukraine is currently grappling with two significant hurdles – an external adversary and an internal foe. Recent sociological surveys conducted by Info Sapiens reveal that 88% of Ukrainian citizens consider corruption to be among the most pressing issues facing the country. The Moskalev case serves as a vivid illustration of this problem.

Alicia Kearns, Tagapangulo ng UK Foreign Affairs Committee at Conservative MP, din kinilala Ukraine’s efforts in fighting corruption in an interview with The Telegraph. She said, “What I have found really interesting about Ukrainians is they don’t take it as an attack when you talk to them about the need to reform. What other country, while being at war, says we’re also going to reform our judicial processes, making sure there’s more accountability, to try to deal with corruption more. Most people say we can’t do both at once, give us a moment. They have tried to do both, but there is a long way for their society to come as yet.” 

It is worth noting that Ukraine has indeed made significant efforts in the fight against corruption and the reform of its judiciary system in recent years. To achieve this, the country has established specialized anti-corruption bodies like the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU), the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office (SAP), and the High Anti-Corruption Court. Transparency International Ukraine’s experts have pointed to the successful implementation of the Anti-Corruption Strategy and the State Anti-Corruption Program (SAP), as well as increased arrests and investigations in high-level corruption cases, and the use of the Prozorro system for most procurement, as the main drivers behind the recent drop in corruption levels.

However, Alicia Kearns is right – Ukraine still has a long way to go.

Ibahagi ang artikulong ito:

Ang EU Reporter ay naglalathala ng mga artikulo mula sa iba't ibang panlabas na mapagkukunan na nagpapahayag ng malawak na hanay ng mga pananaw. Ang mga posisyong kinuha sa mga artikulong ito ay hindi naman sa EU Reporter.

Nagte-trend